Skip to main content

Fan Theories Seven

Star Trek's Data had a field commission before attending Starfleet Academy.

This website points out that  Data joined Starfleet shortly (2341 CE) after being rescued but was still at the academy in 2378*.

If both dates** are correct then perhaps Data didn't become a officer until 2278 because he joined as an enlisted man. At some point either he was required to serve on the bridge or as part of an away team. Both require an officer's commission to participate so I would imagine that Data was given a field commission by his commanding officer (the captain of the Trieste?) in order to do so.

To be promoted further Data then had to attend the academy. It is possible that Miles O'Brien went through the same process but that he declined academy attendance in order to take the position of Transporter Chief on the USS Enterprise-D.

On closer inspection I appear to be wearing loafers.

*The first series of Star Trek: The Next Generation actually begins in 2364. The '78 may be a reference to a "stardate", or the writers got their in-universe facts wrong. 

However, this theory may still apply to O'Brien, Data.
...and Reginald Barclay.

When Data joined Starfleet his very sentience was in question. Therefore, it seems unlikely that they would allow an android who had only been activated for four years to become a cadet. 

Considering the apparent size of Starfleet (7000 ships(?) and over 500 bases) and there only being one academy, it seems probable that many officers received their commissions in this manner. It may be that promotions are based on the number of transfers an officer receives. This explains why Barclay is still a junior lieutenant (he'd be too old) and Harry Kim never gets promoted during the entire seven year run of Voyager.

Or the writers of Star Trek have no idea how a regular military operates. Not that Starfleet is a regular military.

**I'd also point out that the actual year is rarely mentioned with all specific dates being described using the "stardate" system (which is incomprehensible).

Also, commander Maddox is too young to have denied Data his commission in 2341.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fan theories 2

Just as Childhood's End (first theory) could be viewed as a prelude or explanation of many SF fictional universes (the "Overmind" is the Force in Star Wars, among others) the film AI could be a seen as a mythological version of the founding of The Culture -in particular the "panhumans" described as being abundant in the (well "our") galaxy and beyond.  At the film's epilogue, all the humans had been killed as a result of a new Ice Age but the descendants (so to speak) of the film's "mechas" (intelligent androids) remain. It could be conceivable that a similar event actually happened in Earth's distant past. A race of hominids, perhaps unknown in the fossil record, invented and heavily utilised, artificial intelligence just before their civilisation was destroyed in an ice age. Of course, a few survivors could have left Earth in spaceships before this happened, but the main point is that the AIs which survived were able to crea...

The Feudal? System of Westeros

Feudalism, such as it is, in  "A Song of Ice and Fire", is an interesting concept when peasants are not bound to the land. There was no Westerosi emperor Diocletian. The great houses operate very much like the old kings of Ireland, and India during the Raj also. In both cases the English monarch became the overlord of these peoples in the same way Aegon the Conqueror conquered six of the seven kingdoms. The Lords are petty kings with the iron throne belonging to an overlord (or High King as was the equivalent case in Ireland). I would assume that every local lord is able to demand some from of tribute from nearby peasants but even this may not be certain. What the main lords subsist on, I would imagine, is their ability to enforce the king's laws and their rights over the lands they rule. This specifically means being able to fine poachers (and criminals in general). One could imply from the television adaptation that each of the main lords depends on their control...

Fan theories 18

Hi there, this is Elench-San and I have more Dragon Ball theories! There is a lot about the franchise that is either contradictory or shouldn't be taken too seriously. For example the anime often shows a realistic globe of the Earth or a view from space with identifiable continents.  But a map of the "Dragon World" is slightly askew.  This perhaps lends to two completely bonkers theories: Dragon World is basically Arda  (as in Middle Earth, Hobbits and shit) or Planetos (as in Wars of the Roses, continent-sized empires, dragons!) OK maybe not, but one can actually connect Toriyama's world with Tolkien's. Both have dragons, gods, werewolves and vampires as well as collectible jewels!  The map often given is reminiscent of that of "Planetos".  The reason a fantasy world maybe set in the distant past of Earth is to do with those titular dragon balls.  This is also why the world is also so apparently depopulated.  ...