Skip to main content

Near-Universal Dole

"Work Is A Curse"
-A Universal Dole Proposal


Technically a "Citizen's Income", this UBI* proposal grants £173 per week for EVERYONE over 21 with a bank account and working full-time (30+ hours per week), alongside any UK citizen or resident (of any age under 25) living away from home or in care.
 
This increases to £325 (per week) when the recipient is between 25 and 55 years of age.

Post-55 this reverts to £173 per week for all previous recipients.
Any previous recipient continues to receive CI regardless of change in age or circumstance- unless they leave the UK for longer than two years or spend longer than two years in prison.

*Universal Basic Income

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income


I also propose:
That all 16 to 21 year olds are entitled to £80 per week for continuing their education.
Full-time students (in further education) are entitled to "sign-on" during vacation periods (again, receiving £80 per week) AND housing benefit during term-time to contribute towards rent and living costs. 

Tuition fees are to be set at a maximum of £7000 a year, with the government always paying half and the rest available as a loan. (Note that the proposed £173 per week works out at £9000 over one year, the amount students currently pay)

This proposal will, hopefully, eliminate poverty and homelessness in young people while encouraging people to work and study without risking remaining in poverty.


Residential qualifications are two years spent living in the UK.


I also propose that recent arrivals-long term are treated as residents-claiming asylum are entitled to £150 a week for the first three months and are entitled to work as soon as they arrive**. They are entitled to "sign-on" for £80 a week (if under 25) or £150 per week (if over 25). Asylum seekers and refugees have the right to work AND to live where they want.


The "dole", in any case, is not available to existing UBI recipients, but citizens and residents can claim disability (and housing) benefits alongside specific grants and loans for equipment. These loans, plus those used to pay university tuition fees, are paid for by National Insurance contributions. When the debt is paid, workers no longer pay NI.  


In short, National Insurance is effectively abolished.
Taxes on the Poor, such as rent, Council Tax and Value Added Tax (VAT) are effectively covered by the Citizen's Income. Working will no longer make one poor, neither will not working. The same goes for studying, having children, not having children and caring for a sick friend or relative.

**There should not be unfair competition between temporary and permanent residents/citizens and refugees should not be made destitute or vulnerable to exploitation. Neither should young adults leaving or about to leave care or, for whatever reason, are forced to leave home before they are eighteen. This is why CI does not automatically start at eighteen as there will be people at or over this age who will not need it and have other sources of income but there will be people at this age or younger who cannot rely on their families to support them.
"Leaving home" for university is still counted as leaving home.

People may argue that this cannot be paid for, but any near-automatic benefit automatically entails significantly reduced maintenance costs. In any case Citizen's Income effectively covers most wages, working out at £18,500 a year for most workers. This is actually greater than the salary of a Private in the British Army.
Compared to total government spending of 760 to 800 billion pounds per annum, Citizen's Income is actually less than the twenty thousand pounds spent for every British adult.   
Arguably, poverty-or at least extreme homelessness-could be alleviated by providing everyone between 21 and 55 with £300 to £325 per week (over a month the money would cover the cost of a deposit and rent for a home)
-and providing everyone else with free bus travel, buses providing at least some form of shelter and transport costs currently making looking for and going to work almost prohibitively expensive.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Westeros 2

One thing which bothers me about ASOIAF/GOT  is the height of the Wall and the fact that people have been able to cross over it. Not just stone-age Wildlings but that the (supposedly under-manned and under-funded) Night’s Watch were not only able to get to the top of the Wall but actually place defences on the top!  The Wall is actually so high that people would get blown off by the wind on a regular basis! It is established in the books that the Wall (which is 700 feet high and 300 miles long) protects itself, so perhaps this is more of a plot hole. OK, so let's imagine that the Wall is, actually (more like) 300 feet high and 150 miles long, while some parts of it have fallen down. At these parts the Night's Watch have their fortifications. Specifically Castle Black, Mole's Fort which basically contains a trebuchet and Eastwatch, where the Wall is a consistent 200 feet high and extends 60 feet into the Narrow Sea  There are a number of abandoned castles on the W...

Fan theories 2

Just as Childhood's End (first theory) could be viewed as a prelude or explanation of many SF fictional universes (the "Overmind" is the Force in Star Wars, among others) the film AI could be a seen as a mythological version of the founding of The Culture -in particular the "panhumans" described as being abundant in the (well "our") galaxy and beyond.  At the film's epilogue, all the humans had been killed as a result of a new Ice Age but the descendants (so to speak) of the film's "mechas" (intelligent androids) remain. It could be conceivable that a similar event actually happened in Earth's distant past. A race of hominids, perhaps unknown in the fossil record, invented and heavily utilised, artificial intelligence just before their civilisation was destroyed in an ice age. Of course, a few survivors could have left Earth in spaceships before this happened, but the main point is that the AIs which survived were able to crea...

Fan Theories

Family Guy is really set in Hell! Specifically one of the Hells in the  Culture  novel "Surface Detail". The television programme "American Dad!" is also set in one of these Hells, but different to the one Family Guy is set in. Think about it. The characters never age and most would end up institutionalised if they lived in a normal society. It also, perhaps, makes sense that the creators of these Hells would consider early twentieth century North America, Earth, a suitable place to set these Hells. In Surface Detail the Hells are terrible places where the downloaded  personalities of the dead are maintained. It's denizens are routinely raped by demons (one of whom may be Glen Quagmire ) or forced into arbitrary wars. All rapes result in pregnancy (Hell is a pretty horrible place of course), which is reminiscent of certain Family Guy episodes where unexpected or bizarre pregnancies occur.